I
hate to simply repeat the conventional wisdom, but I don’t have much choice
when I don’t disagree with it at all.
The plain fact is that The Jungle comes
as a major letdown from director Andrew Traucki after his refreshingly modest
but intense The Reef (2010). Apart from simply not being anywhere near as
good, Traucki missteps further by wading into the already overused and
increasingly aggravating “found footage” genre, which is characterized most
absurdly by characters’ unfailing expertise at keeping cameras pointed exactly
in the right direction while fleeing for their lives in terror. Here, an arrogant wildlife adventurer (in the
vein of Steve Irwin) takes to the wilds of Indonesia in search of a large and
endangered leopard. The locals warn (as
locals always do) of darker forces in the surrounding jungle, but the hero
scoffs and proceeds to hack his way through the vines, followed closely by his
faithful cameraman. What they find
instead of the leopard seems to be some sort of cryptozoological creature like
Bigfoot or the chupacabra. It’s
hungry. The scares are tepid and
obvious. The characters are unlikeable
and unoriginal. There are no new or
interesting ideas or twists anywhere in the film. A film like this could potentially be rescued
by its camerawork and exotic locations, but I was never even slightly convinced
that we were really in Indonesia at all, and I was genuinely floored to learn
that it was indeed shot on location there.
It looks like it was filmed in the hills out behind someone’s suburban
neighborhood. It even ends exactly like
all these movies do, with the monster/ghost/killer/whoever darting right into
the camera while shrieking. Lame but
mostly just disappointing.
No comments:
Post a Comment