Thursday, November 5, 2015

The Green Inferno

Eli Roth – 2015 – USA
 
The Green Inferno is Eli Roth’s long-awaited first original feature in roughly a decade; (I’m not counting Hostel II, which everyone knows he shouldn’t have bothered with).  Though shown at festivals in 2013, the film was stuck in distribution limbo for two years, due to legal disputes, not its controversial content.  It took so long to come out that it was in theaters simultaneously with Roth’s subsequent feature; Knock Knock.  Roth is definitely an auteur, though that doesn’t necessarily mean he is a great director too.  Even on the basis of his first two films, it was evident that he had a certain sensibility that he was interested in portraying on film, and that he was adept at infusing his own personality into his films by cramming them with things that he happens to love, sometimes regardless of logic or consistency of tone.  I admire several things about him and his style; starting with the fact that he is resolutely fixed on telling concise genre stories with minimal apologetics or artistic flamboyance.  While the treatment of themes is often heavy-handed – both in the films and by Roth himself in interviews – it’s so much so that it almost becomes part of the satirical posture of the films.  This one is a homage to the cycle of gory Italian cannibal films of the 70s and 80s, particularly the Citizen Kane of that genre, Ruggero Deodato’s Cannibal Holocaust (1980).  Homages aren’t that novel in horror, of course, but I suppose Roth deserves points for expressing admiration for the cannibal genre, mainly because no one else seems as interested.  The film doesn’t appear to have sparked a resurgence in demand for movies about snotty white people getting taken captive, tortured and eaten by savages.  Roth is at a slight disadvantage – despite the benefit of latter-day special effects – because the 70s films were truly outlaw, so outrageous and vile that a genuine simulation could never happen in our sensitive times.  (For any who may not know, one of the common – and most reprehensible – elements in those films was the actual killing of animals on camera.)  Continuing his treatise on the arrogance of frivolous Americans treating the world like their personal playground – as in Cabin Fever (2003) and Hostel (2005) – Roth takes aim at trendy environmental activism this time around, and it’s a well-earned target in my opinion.  In case anyone is in danger of missing the point, a character announces within the first five minutes that most crusaders care much more about the glamour of appearing heroic than in actually figuring out how to change anything.  A group of spoiled college kids head to the Amazon to rescue an indigenous tribe from the bulldozers of an evil development corporation.  Needless to say, things don’t go so good.  Maybe ‘restraint’ isn’t the best word to describe Roth’s style, but – despite his fondness for scenes of people dying horribly – he tends to milk more from the threat of mutilation than the actual sight of it.  (This is borne out by the interesting fact that when The Green Inferno was censored in the Philippines to make it equivalent to our PG-13 rating, it was only shortened by five minutes!)  Certainly other films have been far more gratuitously violent than Roth’s, but his agenda is unabashedly to entertain, not to simply nauseate and certainly not to depress his audience; (Lars von Trier and his ilk can be left to specialize in that).  Roth has a dual passion for visceral horror and bawdy comedy.  (I won’t pretend to have discerned that on my own; I heard him say so in one of his DVD commentaries.)  Therefore, amid all the splatter and carnage, there is also a disarmingly incongruous weakness for cheap gags, to a degree that many critics and audiences find unacceptable.  Most movie-goers tend to crave violence or laughter, but rarely both so close together.  Roth’s dorky sense of humor tends to be taken as a sign that he is either amateurish or, at best, unconcerned about the wild mood swings his films seem to bear.  I don’t know that the two moods work well or often, but – for better or worse – their combination is Roth’s own honest worldview.  They can at least be seen as commensurate extremes that stretch so far that they eventually meet.

No comments:

Post a Comment