Ted Geoghegan – 2015 – USA
I quite enjoyed We Are Still Here because somehow it
assures you – through little more than its lack of pretension and obvious
affection for classic horror stories – that it is not just another in a long,
weary parade of cheap supernatural jolters, and that it has something to offer
even though it isn’t necessarily re-writing the book on haunted house
movies. Set vaguely in upstate New York
vaguely in the late 70s, it tells the story of a middle-aged husband and wife
moving into a new house in the countryside in the hopes of getting over the
recent death of their college-aged son.
Almost as soon as they arrive, eerie manifestations begin to occur, and
the wife is quick to assume that their son’s spirit has followed them into
their new home. We quickly, learn,
however, that the house was previously inhabited by a family who were
persecuted by their fellow townspeople, that their ghosts are still captive in
the house, and that the house itself may have an agenda all its own. The movie is cheap-looking, and that’s what I
like about it. The actors are slightly
second-rate and all the more interesting for it; like the décor and special effects,
the performances are more genuinely “70s” than most self-consciously retro
films. I was particularly interested in
the make-up effects. They reminded me of
The Fog (1980), where the ghosts were
slimy and waterlogged; here they also bear the injuries of their deaths, in
this case burning. Like many of the best
horror films, We Are Still Here –
despite its key supernatural element – affirms that we have much more to fear
from the world of the living than the dead.
No comments:
Post a Comment