Potentially destined to become a
camp classic, Stonewall transports us
to a time and place that never existed, where something vague but important
transpired at the hands of people no one remembers. One can’t remember them because actual heroes
(and villains) of the Stonewall riots are either reduced to one-dimensional
stereotypes or replaced by wholly fictional characters in this extremely
artificial rendering by Roland Emmerich, attempting to now do for gay rights
what he once did for alien invasions and other apocalyptic cataclysms. The colorful, edgy and grubby street life of
Greenwich Village in the late 60s is transformed by Emmerich’s Stonewall into a Disneyesque street set
where almost everything appears to take place in a limited section of the city
in front of a diner, a stoop and a conveniently placed park bench. The backdrop is as phony-looking as those in
George Lucas’s Star Wars prequel
trilogy, where actors in sparkling clean clothes and flawless, head-shot makeup
frolic to and fro in front of video game quality backgrounds transplanted onto
green screens. Square-jawed and boringly
pious Jeremy Irvine plays a Midwesterner driven away from home by homophobic
prejudice and – like Oliver Twist, presumably – is instantly adopted by a
gaggle of street urchins. Some may be hustlers
and some may be junkies, but you’ll never know because all they do is flounce
about comically in a way that is ostensibly meant to be endearing. The strongest stuff – however shamelessly clichéd
it is – is the early part of the story of Irvine back home. Once in New York, though, he seems to have no
opinions or thoughts about anything except that – despite being clean, bright,
likeable and white – can’t manage to think of any way to earn a living except
by letting dirty old men blow him, which he endures with gritted teeth lest his
otherwise superhuman righteousness be tarnished. And as the riots begin to brew, this
character, who has had no passions or convictions of note thus far except a
desire to express the love that dare not speak its name suddenly transforms
into a strident agitator, shrieking “gay power” while hurdling a trash can into
a window just like Spike Lee. It’s embarrassing
but it’s also an affront to the real story, which was a little more complicated
than the film suggests. In a
cringe-worthy post-script, we’re educated that the Stonewall incident’s legacy
concerns little more than the annoying and wasteful street parades that people
in major cities have to put up with.
Stonewall is correctly known as a marker for the beginning of the modern
gay rights movement, when beleaguered citizens said “enough” to endless abuse and
harassment and risked their lives and freedom to actually fight back against
armed police. You’d never know that from
watching this film, though, because it appears to be tailor-made to be shown in
classrooms as a way for lazy teachers to tell lazy students, in a nutshell,
that things used to suck and now they’re great.
Strangely, there was another Stonewall movie made exactly 20 years ago
and it wasn’t very good either. There
needs to be more to a work of art than merely a symbolic pat on the back to
reassure I-don’t-know-who that goodness always wins.
No comments:
Post a Comment