Of any American director of his
generation, Richard Linklater is certainly deserving of a documentary, but 21 Years is a pretty flimsy tribute,
however well-intentioned. It’s comprised
of only two types of material; extensive interviews with a handful of
collaborators interspersed with cute animated bits that occasionally underscore
what’s being said. There isn’t much
biographical information, no comments by Linklater himself, and – most importantly
– very little analysis of Linklater’s style, methods and themes save for quick,
scattered observations by the participants.
The film appears crafted entirely around the few celebrities who could
be persuaded to take part; whose interviews are then milked to death since the
filmmakers opted against finding a way to augment them with anything else. Of all the interviewees, it seems to me that
only Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy are especially relevant, especially Hawke, who
has been more-or-less Linklater’s alter ego in some half-dozen films. Others, like Keanu Reeves and Jason Reitman,
don’t seem to have much more of a right to be there than anyone else. Where are Wiley Wiggins, Jason London, any of
the many stars of Slacker, or even
any substantial scholars or critics who may have something more interesting to
say about Linklater than about what a cool guy he is? Dunaway and Wood offer no explanation – in the
film itself, at least – about why they settled on a fixed period of years,
1991-2012, when Linklater was also quite active prior to 1991’s Slacker, as any true fan knows. The complete absence of any mention of his
1988 debut feature, It’s Impossible to
Learn to Plow by Reading Books, is an egregious oversight. To ignore that film while letting Billy Bob
Thornton ramble on about the remake of The
Bad News Bears (2006) is a miscalculation at best and at worst an insult to
the very people who care enough about Linklater to bother seeking out a
documentary about him. The filmmakers
come off as startstruck, allowing Reeves, Zac Efron and Matthew McConaughey to
pontificate endlessly as though they were quite the genius philosophers without
equal. I suppose you can argue that the
film is at least better than nothing… well, you
can; I’d rather not.
No comments:
Post a Comment