Anthony Mann – 1958 – USA
A staggering achievement by the
sadly under-recognized Anthony Mann, coming at the apex of a series of very
strong genre films in the late 1940s and 50s, including a few other near
masterpieces – such as Border Incident (1950),
The Naked Spur (1953), Men in War (1957), among others. My own suspicion is that Mann is frequently
missed in surveys of the great directors of the 50s because he made so many
westerns and in that genre, older masters like John Ford and Howard Hawks were
still in their prime too. Mann is
clearly not in their class, but along with Budd Boetticher, Samuel Fuller,
Andre de Toth a few others, he shares credit for the flowering of the golden age
of mature westerns that took place in the 50s, which was not managed by Ford
alone even though The Searchers remains
its greatest testament. What struck me
most upon seeing Man of the West for
the first time in many years was Mann’s use of the 2.35 widescreen frame as a canvas
for arranging his elements. The format
had been used often for epics, of course, but this is one of the earliest
CinemaScope films I’ve seen in which it is apparent that a thoughtful director deliberately
composed for the frame, in a way that not even Ford really did until Cheyenne Autumn (1964). I see the roots of John Carpenter’s style in
Mann much more than in his professed idol Hawks, none of whose westerns are in
2.35, which is Carpenter’s preferred aspect ratio. In the film, Gary Cooper is a retired gunman
who is stranded on the plains after his train is robbed, and happens to be
within walking distance to a house that once acted as his old gang’s
hideaway. Naturally, not only is the
gang holed-up there when Cooper arrives with two companions from the train – a gambler
(Arthur O’Connell) and a showgirl (Julie London) – but it turns out that they
were the ones who stopped the train. Cooper’s
old mentor (Lee J. Cobb) is particularly happy to see him again and presumes
that he is back for good. Cobb’s gang is
comprised of younger men who are either real sons or adopted ones, and they’re
an unruly, not-very-bright lot, and it’s clear why Cobb is sorely in need of
Cooper’s level-headed influence. Cooper
must keep his cool while calculating how to escape before the gang loses its
patience with him and before they get their hands on London. Dark and hard-edged for its time, the film is
all about undercutting the mystique of western outlaws. Despite his talk of honor and loyalty, Cobb
is weak and lifts not a finger when his gang forces London to perform a
striptease, prior to worse abuse. Like
the compromised patriarchs in several Mann films – especially The Man from Laramie (1955) – he is
stuck in a reverie of the past and is dependent on little more than his former
reputation to maintain order. The film’s
climax is as stark and desolate as any in a 50s western. Luring the men into a ghost town one by one,
Cooper dispatches them at his leisure, and then finds himself in a shouting
match with Cobb at opposite ends of a rocky valley. In Mann’s films, this is the real legacy of
the Old West, not wholesome cowboys outwitting bandits, but two morally
questionable middle-aged men alone in a vast, echoing landscape, in a pitiful struggle
to the death. Even its title, Man of the West, announces its
director’s agenda to critique western heroism.
Assuming that Cooper is the titular ‘man of the west,’ he is shown to be
laconic and slow to action for good reasons; he has a past that won’t bear much
scrutiny and his aging hands may not be as a quick as a rugged gunman’s should. And yet, as in Sam Peckinpah’s forthcoming
movies, (and Walter Hill’s even later ones), the character’s obvious flaws and frailties
don’t mean that he is incapable of making new choices as time goes on, which,
if they don’t redeem him, at least may offset some of his past sins and give
new generations a chance at a better future.
No comments:
Post a Comment