Carnage was a strange movie for me to
experience. I was thoroughly unimpressed
with almost everything about it, and yet the anticipation of some cinematic
flourishes from Roman Polanski – one of a tiny handful of directors I’d
consider the greatest still alive – kept me in rapt attention. Granted, those moments came but once or
twice, but I wonder if this was Polanski’s plan all along; to use his very name
and reputation as a source of suspense.
I felt the same way during his conservative interpretation of Oliver
Twist (2005); the feeling that this material done by Polanski
surely will have a dark and surreal twist. But both films ultimately disappoint, not
from a dramatic but from a cinematic perspective. In Carnage, specifically, I sort of
felt that Polanski was doing his Woody Allen impression; something I can’t
say I’d always longed for. (I suppose
now that fellow cradle-robber Allen has left New York for the time being, Polanski felt
free to make his own film about neurotic, self-absorbed, upper-middle-class
Manhattanites.) As a filmed play, it is fairly non-ambitious,
with Polanski making almost no effort to “open it up” save for a brief prologue
and epilogue, a move that no doubt pleases theatre-buffs. Since Polanski left Yasmina Reza’s
play so dutifully intact, we have little choice but to treat the film as a
play, and as such it merely reminded me how much I can’t stand the theatre,
what with constant overacted wit and endless irrational excuses to
keep everyone in a confined space for precisely as long, coincidentally, as it
takes for one’s patience to run out. I’m
no expert, but it seems like the whole two-couples-playing-emotional-cat-and-mouse-games
thing has been done frequently before – (including in Polanski’s own, far
superior Bitter Moon, 1992) – but since the greatest of all
stage-to-screen adaptations, Mike Nichols’ film of Edward Albee’s Who’s
Afraid of Virginia Woolf (1966) was so perfect, I wonder why anyone would
bother doing the same thing and invite comparisons. Lastly, while Carnage is still a good
movie, while watching it I could never shake from my mind the item I’d read
about it’s budget being something like $25,000,000.00, which – given it’s
single location and mere four characters – seems inexcusably obscene; only
forgivable if the result was a masterpiece, which it isn’t.

No comments:
Post a Comment