Rob Epstein & Jeffrey Friedman – 2013 – USA
You can sense that the
cast of Lovelace wanted so much for
this film to be the Oscar-winning prestige film of the year that it’s kind of
sad. It’s a great story, of course, and
could have been handled in so many interesting ways. Instead, it’s a fairly by-the-numbers bio-pic
that leaves you feeling just blah rather than moved or impressed. One problem is the intoxicating nostalgia for
the 70s that filmmakers have a hard time overcoming. The film wants to be a combination of What’s Love Got To Do With It? (1993) and
Boogie Nights (1997) so badly that it
gets bogged down in décor, wardrobe, slang and its disco/funk soundtrack at the
expense of characters that seem capable of independent thought. Amanda Seyfried is fine as Linda Lovelace,
star of the breakthrough porn classic Deep
Throat (1972); I don’t consider her part of the problem in the same way
that the writing and direction are. The film,
in my opinion, has two things going for it; one being the performance of Peter
Sarsgaard as Lovelace’s abusive husband.
The fact that this is the kind of thing that he apparently can do in his
sleep is irrelevant; it’s captivating and legitimately scary in spite of the
script’s clichés. The second plus is the
interesting approach of letting the story play out first as Linda portrayed her
life to outsiders, and then again with the behind-the-scenes melodrama that she
previously kept to herself. That is
intriguing but it’s not substantial enough to carry the film. Sharon Stone gives a great performance as
Linda’s mother. You can feel her begging
for her Oscar with every nuance, and she may deserve it too, but won’t likely
get it for this lackluster movie.
Strangely enough, while Lovelace herself is remote and apathetic for
most of the film, the most emotionally potent moment comes from Robert Patrick
as her father, during a phone conversation in which he tries to express his
visceral agony at seeing his sweet daughter gaining fame for the things she
does in Deep Throat. While trying to earn points as a feminist
tract in its closing moments, I have my doubts as to some its historical
authenticity. For example, Lovelace is
shown being interviewed on TV soon after leaving the porn industry, and is
portrayed as strong and liberated. In
reality, though, she looked perpetually dazed and medicated at that time and
was rarely without the dour Gloria Steinem at her side, working her like a
puppet.

No comments:
Post a Comment