Walter Hill – 2017 – USA
Don’t ask me for a recommendation
on this one. I’m one of the three or
four people in the world who loved Walter Hill’s last film, Bullet to the Head (2013). I’m incapable of processing The Assignment in any other context than
as part of Hill’s filmography. If it
also happens to be an action film, a psychological thriller or a study of
transgender issues, that’s purely incidental.
If those are what you’re after, you’re probably better off looking
elsewhere. If you know and admire Hill’s
work, though, you should be intrigued.
His stories are rooted in the same hard-boiled crime dramas from which
Quentin Tarantino’s also descend, but he avoids all of Tarantino’s
post-modernism and self-referential affects; which doesn’t endear him to
critics but which makes his films admirably concise and unpretentious. The
Assignment returns us to the noirish but strangely fantastic urban worlds
of past Hill classics like The Driver (1978), Streets of Fire (1984) and Johnny
Handsome (1989). In a surprising and
bold performance, Michelle Rodriguez plays a male hitman, Frank Kitchen, who unwittingly
murders the brother of a brilliant but unstable plastic surgeon (Sigourney
Weaver), and is punished by her with a forced sex-change operation. Understandably, Frank is pretty steamed when he
wakes up in his new body, and vows revenge.
Casual viewers will undoubtedly dwell upon the extent to which
Rodriguez’s drag is effective, and in so doing will miss most of what makes the
film interesting, such as the more subtle explorations of gender confusion,
like Frank’s girlfriend’s nickname of ‘Johnnie’ and Weaver’s mannish wardrobe
of business suit and short haircut.
Remarkably – possibly even miraculously – the film somehow steers clear
of a social-political debate about the phenomenon of sexual reassignment
surgery and gender identity. I can
hardly think of another film that has this as a major plot element and yet is
not, so to speak, an ‘advocacy film’ on the subject; in a sense, its cavalier
acceptance of transgenderism (voluntary or not) makes it more progressive than
films that would only think to present the lead character as a pitiful victim
of bullies and bigots. Most importantly,
The Assignment revisits many of the
themes that populate Hill’s best films, in particular the struggle for identity
in an absurd world and the insistence on abiding by some sort of moral code in
order to hold off slipping into complete chaos and animality. Hill’s heroes are rarely angelic, but they
are always contrasted with markedly more violent and depraved villains; (the
Warriors versus the other gangs in The
Warriors, 1979, the lone gunfighter versus the organized mobsters in Last Man Standing, 1996, etc.). Hill is an idiosyncratic auteur and you
either enjoy his style and themes as they relate from film to film or you won’t
see what the big deal is at all. Good
luck.
No comments:
Post a Comment